Validation of an instrument for assessing vaccination status in life cycles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59464/2359-4632.2025.3721

Keywords:

Validation study, Health Evaluation, Immunization

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the semantic and content validity of the Vaccination Status Assessment in Life Cycles instrument. Methods: This is a methodological instrument validation study. Data collection took place in 2021 and was divided into two stages: the first focused on content validity and the second on semantic validity. Data analysis consisted of calculating the Content Validity Index and the inter-judge agreement index in the first stage, followed by descriptive analysis using the brainstorming technique in the second stage. The study was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee and received a favorable opinion. Results: The required content validity criteria achieved a satisfactory score, as did inter-judge agreement, with only the language criterion receiving a lower score. Regarding the semantic validity evidence, all professionals reported no difficulty understanding the instrument, emphasizing its potential to minimize the challenges faced by professionals during the vaccination process. Conclusion: The instrument has content and semantic validity, which lends credibility to its use in public health services linked to the Unified Health System that provide immunization.

Author Biographies

Igho Leonardo do Nascimento Carvalho, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)

Enfermeiro. Doutor em saúde coletiva. Docente da Universidade Federal do Piauí

Amanda Vieira Sarmento, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)

Enfermeira. Residente de enfermagem obstétrica do HUMAP-UFMS

Ingrid Moura de Abreu, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)

Enfermeira. Doutora em enfermagem. Docente da Universidade Federal do Piauí.

Maria Augusta Rocha Bezerra, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)

Enfermeira. Doutora em enfermagem. Docente da Universidade Federal do Piauí

Laura Kelly de Oliveira Barbosa, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)

Acadêmica do curso Bacharelado em enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Piauí

References

García-Toledano E, et al. Design and validation of an instrument for evaluating training and education for health and proper use of vaccines “VACUNASEDUCA”. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(8):830. doi:10.3390/vaccines9080830.

Ferreira AV, Freitas PHB, Viegas SMF, Oliveira VC. Acesso à sala de vacinas da estratégia saúde da família: aspectos organizacionais. Rev Enferm UFPE On Line. 2017;11(10):3869–77. doi:10.5205/1981-8963-v11i10a69709p3869-3877-2017.

Silva AG, et al. Cobertura vacinal no Brasil e fatores associados: análise de séries temporais, 2015–2021. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2024;27(Suppl 2):e20231124.

Domingues CMAS, Teixeira AMS. Vacinação no Brasil: desafios e perspectivas pós-pandemia. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023;33(Suppl 2):e20231206.

Silveira MF, et al. Vaccination coverage, inequalities, and social determinants of COVID-19 in Brazil: an ecological study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;9:100193. doi:10.1016/j.lana.2022.100193.

MacDonald NE, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope, and determinants – an updated review. Vaccine. 2023;41(1):8–18. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.001.

Sistema de Informações do Programa Nacional de Imunizações (SIPNI/DATASUS). 2023. Disponível em: http://sipni.datasus.gov.br/si-pniweb/faces/inicio.jsf.

Costa P, Meneses NFA, Carmo CJ, Solis-Cordero K, Palombo CNT. Completude e atraso vacinal das crianças antes e após intervenção educativa com as famílias. Cogitare Enferm. 2020;25:e67497. doi:10.5380/ce.v25i0.67497.

Santos CJ, Ferreira AV, Oliveira VC, Viegas SMF. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV-BR). Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023;41:e2022147. doi:10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2022147.

Pasquali L. Instrumentação psicológica. 1ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009.

Bhatia O, Singh R, Gupta N, Arora S, Kumar A. Development and validation of a structured knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire to assess adult immunization. Vaccine. 2024;42(12):1578–85. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.034.

Kumari A, Ranjan P, Chopra S, Kaur D, Kaur T, Kalanidhi KB, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitude, practices, and concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15(3):919–25. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2021.04.001.

Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16(7):3061–8. doi:10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006.

Rodrigues LBB, Leite AC, Yamamura M, Deon KC, Arcêncio RA. Coordenação das redes de atenção à saúde pela atenção primária: validação semântica de um instrumento adaptado. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(7):1385–90. doi:10.1590/0102-311X00137613.

Amaral GG, et al. Perfil sociodemográfico e laboral dos vacinadores das unidades de atenção primária à saúde do Brasil. Enferm Foco. 2025;16: [no prelo].

Fernández-Gómez E, et al. Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1136.

Luque-Vara T, et al. Content validation of an instrument for the assessment of school teachers’ levels of knowledge of diabetes through expert judgment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):8605.

Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–5.

Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97.

Khalid MN, et al. Development and evaluation of content validity and acceptance of a multidomain intervention module for reversal of cognitive frailty among older adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2024;19:1189–1202.

Poiraud C, et al. Understanding and preventing vaccination errors. Infect Dis Now. 2023;53(2):104641.

Oliveira SH, et al. Prevalence and underreporting of immunization errors in childhood vaccination: results of a household survey. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023;57:e20230253.

Silva LLT, et al. Patient safety in Primary Health Care: perception of the nursing team. Esc Anna Nery. 2021;26:e20210130.

Kaboré L, et al. Quality and reliability of vaccination documentation in the routine childhood immunization program in Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional survey. Vaccine. 2020;38(13):2808–15.

Kibeti DM, et al. Quality and usability of home-based record photos to assess vaccine coverage: a case study from the 2022 Democratic Republic of the Congo Vaccine Coverage Survey. Vaccine. 2025;59:127248.

Higgins-Steele A, et al. Recording vaccine doses administered: a global analysis of tally sheet design for infant and child immunizations. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025;5(10):e0004973.

World Health Organization (WHO). Leave no one behind: guidance for planning and implementing booster vaccination. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240016514.

Pavia G, et al. Integrating digital health solutions with immunization strategies: improving immunization coverage and monitoring in the post-COVID-19 era. Vaccines (Basel). 2024;12(8):847.

Ngo-Bebe D, et al. Reasons for over-reporting of routine immunization administrative data in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a mixed cross-sectional study to determine explanatory factors for poor data quality. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):3272.

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Carvalho, I. L. do N., Sarmento, A. V., Abreu, I. M. de, Bezerra, M. A. R., & Barbosa, L. K. de O. (2025). Validation of an instrument for assessing vaccination status in life cycles. Revista Científica Integrada, 8(1), e202528. https://doi.org/10.59464/2359-4632.2025.3721

Most read articles by the same author(s)