THE CHALLENGES OF JUDICIALIZATION IN NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE PRINCIPLE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Jacson Roberto Cervi Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões, URI, Campus de Santo Ângelo/RS.

Abstract

The research investigates the contribution of the Judiciary in Brazil, under the bias of neoconstitutionalism, in the search for implementation of the principle of sustainable development. From an analysis of the protagonism of the judiciary in relation to the other powers of the Republic, its possible benefits in the implementation of the Constitution and possible risks arising from possible excesses of judicial activism, we seek to evaluate judicial action in the motive of sustainable development. Possible conclusions point to a greater openness of the Judiciary Power to citizen participation and the replacement of mechanistic, individualistic and extractivist understandings, prevalent in the legal sciences, by a more systemic, holistic and humanistic right. Dialectical method and bibliographic research.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-08

How to Cite

Cervi, J. R. (2020). THE CHALLENGES OF JUDICIALIZATION IN NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE PRINCIPLE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Revista Paradigma, 29(3), 85–104. Retrieved from https://revistas.unaerp.br/paradigma/article/view/1715

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 3 (2020): REVISTA PARADIGMA

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Jacson Roberto Cervi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

By submitting articles to Revista Paradigma, the author already authorizes their publication in case of approval after due evaluation process, aware of the journal's free access policy.

The author declares that he is aware that all information included in the submission will be published, including name, affiliation, title and email address.