THE (IM) POSSIBILITY OF DISCUSSING LAW IN THESIS IN POPULAR ACTION

Authors

  • Fabiana de Paula Lima Isaac Mattaraia
  • Sebastião Sérgio da Silveira UNAERP

Abstract

The Popular Action, a genuineinstrument for thedefenseof transindividual interests, represents a legal weapon for thecitizen'scontrolofactsharmfultoestablishedconstitutionalinterests. Therefore, wesoughttoevaluate in thisarticlewhethernormativeactscanbeobjectof Popular Action, as well as toevaluatetheconstitutionalitycontrol in these cases, whether it isallowedornot. It wasobservedthatthecurrentjurisprudenceconsidersadequatewaytochallengenormativeactsthat are, in fact, trueadministrativeacts, devoidofthecharacterof Law, thatis, theelementsofabstractionandgenerality. Moreover, it hasbeenfoundthatan incidental declarationofunconstitutionalityispossible, providedthatthisisnottherequestofthe Popular Action, but a consequencethereof. Finally, it wasevidencedthatthereis in thejurisprudencejudgedthatextinguishthe Popular Actionif it isshownthattherewasnotevenspecificitybythePlaintiffof a case contractofdamagetopublicpropertyandmorality, beingclearlyused for annulmentof Law, in usurpationofjurisdictionoftheSupremeCourt.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-11

How to Cite

Mattaraia, F. de P. L. . I., & da Silveira, S. S. (2020). THE (IM) POSSIBILITY OF DISCUSSING LAW IN THESIS IN POPULAR ACTION. Anais Do Congresso Brasileiro De Processo Coletivo E Cidadania, 7(7), 5–17. Retrieved from https://revistas.unaerp.br/cbpcc/article/view/1709

Issue

No. 7 (2019): Proceedings of the Brazilian Congress on Collective Process and Citizenship

Section

Direitos coletivos

Most read articles by the same author(s)