DISMISSAL FOR DUE CAUSE IN CASE OF CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY: AN ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUE

Authors

  • Anna Elisa Peixoto Macari USP - FDRP
  • Jair Aparecido Cardoso USP - FDRP

Abstract

This paper discusses the legal, ethical, and social aspects of dismissal for due cause of workers
in situations of chemical dependency. Recognized as a disease by the OMS, chemical
dependency requires an approach that goes beyond punishment, taking into account social,
cultural, and public health factors. The application of Article 482 of the CLT is analyzed,
especially regarding habitual intoxication or intoxication at work, in light of the Federal
Constitution, highlighting that the Superior Labor Court (TST) and the 2nd Regional Labor
Court (TRT-2) have acknowledged that dismissals motivated solely by addiction, without prior
offer of treatment or support, may be considered discriminatory and null. It is concluded that
dismissal for cause in such cases should not be the first measure taken, and principles such as
human dignity, the right to health, and social reintegration should prevail, reinforcing the
responsibility of companies to adopt a humanized and inclusive approach.

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Peixoto Macari, A. E., & Aparecido Cardoso, J. (2025). DISMISSAL FOR DUE CAUSE IN CASE OF CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY: AN ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUE. Anais Do Congresso Brasileiro De Processo Coletivo E Cidadania, 13(13), 775–788. Retrieved from https://revistas.unaerp.br/cbpcc/article/view/3917

Issue

Section

Tutela Coletiva do Trabalho e a Reforma Trabalhista

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>